In the article “Historically Incorrect Canooding” by
Stephanie Coontz talks about how the marriages we see nowadays is all getting
divorced and worst but is the day we supposed to be romantic meant a lot of
less than it does today, before. The valentine day holiday was made to decrease
the sexual passion.” No one believed that falling in love was great and glorying
thing that should lead to marriage.” Love, passion, marriage was not an equal match
back in the 1800’s; actually, valentine day was another holiday which was a
festival honored to Juno “the Roman goddess of love and marriage." The church
fathers would rather the holiday become a festival of Lupercalia, in which the
men will draw a name from a jar and the woman they pick will be there sex partner
for the rest of the year. The legend enforced the rule that the Roman soldiers will
fight better if they didn’t have family ties. Pope Gregory the Great wrote that
while marriage was not technically sinful, the “carnal pleasure” that husband
and wife derived from sex “cannot under any circumstances be without blame.” This
quote means the wife a husband are not allowed to enjoy they sex they receive from
each other. That should be true if you’re really in love, but back then your
parents chose who you could marry. It was an unfair exchange. In conclusion, I think
the 1800 was all an unfair time, people should have been controlled like that,
they should have had a say so. If my parents had to choose who I could marry, I
would get married at all, you should be with someone you love not how by force.
This post is a bit confusing, especially this line: "but is the day we supposed to be romantic meant a lot of less than it does today, before." Still, it seems like you got the main point of the article. Would like to see a bit more of your own opinions, thoughts, connections, however. 80
ReplyDelete